News from the National
Pork Board
National Commission on
Industrial Farm Animal Production
The National Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production is
a self-named commission that is funded by a $2.6 million grant from
the Pew Charitable Trusts and managed and staffed by the Johns
Hopkins School of Public Health Center for a Livable Future. The
commission is tasked with identifying, defining, and developing
plans to mitigate adverse social, economic, environmental, public
health, and animal health and well-being issues associated with
concentrated animal-feeding operations (CAFOs).
The commission is conducting a 2-year study of intensive
food-animal production and its impact on the aforementioned issues.
The commission will produce interim reports to help the public and
the organization’s commissioners come up with a final
comprehensive report of its findings. The final report, due March
2008, will have recommendations that will be made available to
policymakers, industry stakeholders, and the general public.
Members of the commission come from a variety of backgrounds.
Some of the commissioners include Bill Niman, founder of Niman
Ranch; Brother David Andrews of the National Catholic Rural Life
Conference; Bernard Rollin, professor of philosophy at Colorado
State University; Thomas Hayes, president, Cargill Meat Solutions;
and Dan Glickman, former US Secretary of Agriculture. Some of these
commissioners are well-known advocates against CAFOs.
Commissioners use public meetings as part of their
investigations. At these meetings, stakeholders are invited to
participate by sending in written statements and by appearing in
person to present oral statements of their views. Seven public
meetings have taken place between March 2006 and June 2007. A
meeting is scheduled for September 10 to 12 in Madison, Wisconsin,
and one for November 12 to 14 in Kansas City, Missouri.
As part of its issues management activities, the Pork Checkoff
has been following the activities of the commission. Dr Liz
Wagstrom attended the public hearing that took place in Durham,
North Carolina, on April 10 to 12.
Lynn Harrison, pork producer from Elk Mound, Wisconsin, and
National Pork Board vice president, attended and spoke at the
meeting. His statement focused on his operation and on the
industry’s pride in and stewardship of the environment. Dale
Norton, a producer from Michigan, and chair of the Pork
Checkoff’s Animal Welfare Committee, also attended and spoke
at the meeting. Gene Nemechek, AASV and National Pork Board member,
also attended and spoke about the industry’s commitment to
producing a safe and quality product and about the industry’s
new Pork Quality Assurance Plus program, a continuous improvement
system developed to assure the industry’s customers of our
commitment to food safety and animal well-being. Other speakers
making positive statements for farm-animal production included
poultry, turkey, and dairy producers from the state of North
Carolina.
More information about the National Commission on Industrial
Farm Animal Production can be obtained from Dr Liz Wagstrom at
LWagstrom@pork.org or by
visiting the Commission’s Web site at http://www.ncifap.org/index.html.
Addressing needles in market animals
The Pork Checkoff’s Pork Safety Committee has approved the
distribution of material aimed at increasing producer awareness of
the issue of broken needles in market sows. The campaign is aimed
at focusing producers’ attention on preventing needles in
sows through all aspects of needle management, from choosing the
right needle to having a needle inventory-management system and a
system to dispose of needles adequately.
Because of the time they remain as part of the herd and the
number of treatments that sows receive, (eg, vaccinations,
farrowing induction), the number of times a sow is in contact with
a needle is high. Hence, the potential for a broken needle is
higher than in market hogs. Packers report some needles in sows are
found in the tissue around the jowl and inside the mouth or in the
tongue.
To address the issue of needles in market hogs, the Pork Safety
Committee suggested revamping the “One is Too Many”
campaign. The committee would like the industry to move toward
using needles with higher detectability and less tendency to
break.
On the side of research, more funding will be applied toward
projects researching needle-free technology.
Finally, the committee suggested producer education should focus
on helping producers develop needle inventory-control systems.
As with a sow needle-prevention program, prevention is
considered to be the most effective program to reduce the incidence
of needles found at the packer level. However, it is hard to
negotiate agreement between packers and producers as to how
producers should identify animals suspected of carrying needles or
foreign objects, how packers should be notified, and whether those
animals will be paid for.
Packers anecdotally report an increase in the number of needles
when vaccination or treatments occur. Packers also anecdotally
report a significant reduction in the number of needles as a result
of the “One is Too Many” producer-awareness campaign
headed by the Pork Checkoff.
All stakeholders agree that the consequences of needles being
found in exported product or of a broken needle contaminating a
pork product can significantly hurt the industry.
If you would like more information on the Pork Checkoff’s
available materials to create producer awareness on preventing
needles in market sows and market hogs, contact Steve Larsen at
SLarsen@pork.org.
Research projects funded by the Pork Checkoff from the 2007
swine health general call for research proposals
The research priorities for the general call for proposals
include all animal-health issues except for porcine reproductive
and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) and porcine circovirus associated
disease (PCVAD). PRRS and PCVAD have been addressed individually,
in separate research calls. The projects funded for 2007 from the
general call include those listed in the following table.
NPB continued on page 227
All stakeholders agree that the consequences of needles being
found in exported product or of a broken needle contaminating a
pork product can significantly hurt the industry.
If you would like more information on the Pork Checkoff’s
available materials to create producer awareness on preventing
needles in market sows and market hogs, contact Steve Larsen at
SLarsen@pork.org.
Research projects funded by the Pork Checkoff from the 2007
swine health general call for research proposals
The research priorities for the general call for proposals
include all animal-health issues except for porcine reproductive
and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) and porcine circovirus associated
disease (PCVAD). PRRS and PCVAD have been addressed individually,
in separate research calls. The projects funded for 2007 from the
general call include those listed in the following table.
|
|
| Institution |
Project title |
| Iowa State University |
Genome sequencing of Haemophilus parasuis for improved
swine health |
| Improving swine health: enhancing humoral and cell-mediated
immunity using novel polymer adjuvants |
| Prevalence of slaughter house condemnation due to
Erysipelothrix sp and further characterization of isolates
associated with these cases |
Regents of the University
of Minnesota | Application of an epidemiologic survey tool for Lawsonia
intracellularis |
| The effect of cross-fostering on the transfer of cellular and
humoral maternal immunity to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae |
| South Dakota State University |
Development of a non-antibiotic selection vector for developing
a live vaccine against ETEC-associated porcine post-weaning
diarrhea |
| University of Saskatchewan |
Development of a live attenuated vaccine against swine
influenza by reverse genetics |
|