News from the NPPC
President's Council on Food Safety
The President's Council on Food Safety was established in August
1998 and charged with developing a comprehensive Federal Food
Safety Strategic plan. Dr. Beth Lautner recently attended a public
meeting to discuss the draft of the Strategic Plan. During the
discussion, Dr. Lautner emphasized the importance of developing
a comprehensive food safety research database that captures public
and private sector funding and a framework in which to measure
progress on a common research agenda. In addition, it was noted
that current national animal health surveys could be used to collect
food safety information at the farm level when appropriate.
Industry requirements for needles
Dr. Paul Sundberg met with officials of the company that manufactures
the needles used in the majority of pork production operations
to discuss the industry need for a needle that is strong enough
to withstand the production environment without breaking. Preventing
this physical hazard in pork products is critical to maintaining
domestic and international consumer confidence.
PORK 101 class schedule
The 2000 class schedule for PORK 101 has been published. These
pork quality classes are an excellent educational opportunity
for both swine veterinarians and pork producers. The locations
and dates are as follows:
- March 6-8
Michigan State University;
- March 20-22
Iowa State University;
- May 22-24
Texas A & M University;
- July 17-19
Kansas State University;
- August 9-11
Colorado State University;
- September 25-27
Oklahoma State University; and
- October 16-18
University of Nebraska.
For further information contact Dr. David Meisinger at the
NPPC.
Plum Island Animal Disease Center
Dr. Dave Pyburn and four other AASP members recently attended
the Swine Emphasis Foreign Animal Disease Training Course at the
Plum Island Animal Disease Center at Plum Island, New York. This
is the first time that this training course for Foreign Animal
Disease Diagnosticians has been opened for industry veterinarians
to attend. The purpose of this training is to raise the awareness
of the threat of foreign animal diseases and to expose veterinarians
to the clinical signs and pathologic lesions of foreign animal
diseases to enable swifter recognition and containment of them
in the field. There will be future opportunities for other AASP
members to take advantage of this training.
Pork Checkoff Referendum
On February 28th Secretary Glickman made the announcement
that he is calling for a referendum vote on the pork checkoff.
NPPC supports the law as written in the Pork Act and Order passed
by Congress in 1985, which says that if 15% of bona fide pork
producers want a referendum, one shall be held. Throughout this
process, the NPPC has been concerned that people who were not
pork producers were trying to make decisions that would alter
the future of the producer-funded checkoff programs.
During a meeting on January 5, the USDA stated that it appeared
the petitioners did not have enough legitimate signatures of bona
fide pork producers. According to the USDA, petitioners were 2558
signatures (or nearly 20%) short, without even having gone through
the complete verification process of the entire petition. Of the
petition signatures that the USDA attempted to validate, many
responded that they had not signed the petition or that they did
not sell hogs and were not pork producers.
In 1988, United States pork producers voted to move to a mandatory
checkoff program so that all pork producers would be a part of
the fair and equitable system that provided them with programs
in the areas of research, education, and promotion. At the 2000
Pork Forum, pork producer delegates unanimously approved the following
resolution in support of the checkoff program:
SO#1: NPPC Delegate Body Support for National Checkoff
MOTION: That the National Pork Producers Council Delegate
Body support the national pork checkoff in its current form.
The NPPC also was directed by the delegate body to take measures
to ensure that the USDA develops and implements an open, fair,
transparent, and cost-effective voting procedure for the pork
checkoff referendum.
|