Utilizing alternative indices to compare the conformance of market hogs across three packers
John D. Roberts, DVM, PhD; John Deen, DVM, PhD; Thomas Johnson, PhD; Jay F. Levine, DVM, MPH
Complete article is available online.
PDF version is available online.
Objectives: Generalized Taguchi indices were applied to compare the carcass quality performance of a group of marketed pigs against the quality requirements of three packing companies.
Materials and methods: One hundred eighty pigs from a feeding facility were slaughtered at a packing plant. Carcass quality data was collected from the individual carcasses. Most packers determine individual carcass prices from a matrix that references carcass weight and the percent of lean meat in the carcass. Individual packers determine price using different algorithms applied to the matrices. Group carcass measurements were evaluated using three different packer matrices. The ability of the carcass group to perform for the three packers (A, B, and C) was evaluated using measures of quality performance known as sort loss, average lean premium, expected relative loss (Le), and generalized Taguchi performance (C'pm). Revenue was measured as total revenue and average carcass value.
Results: The matrix of Packer B developed the smallest Le value (0.125) and the largest C'pm index (0.947), indicating that the carcass requirements of Packer B were best satisfied. Sort loss and average lean premium could not be compared among packers. The values of revenue were comparable and Packer C attained the largest.
Discussion: Sort loss and average lean premiumimplied financial information concerning group conformance that was not comparable among packers. The Le provided a comparable descriptive that was easier to interpret than the C'pm.
Implications: Le and C'pm indices may provide a comparison of group carcass quality performance across different packers.
Keywords: swine marketing, Taguchi indices, process capability, process performance
Cite as: Roberts JD, Deen J, Johnson T, et al. Utilizing alternative indices to compare the conformance of market hogs across three packers. J Swine Health Prod 2003;11(6):284-290.
Search the AASV web site for pages with similar keywords.