What's your interpretation? (Non-Refereed)
This chart illustrates data collected from finishing groups (approximately 50,000 head) closed out during a quarter, showing the cumulative percent death loss in the finisher phase by week. What could be the cause of the mortality and what can be done to control the problem and return to target levels (<2.0% mortality)?
It is difficult to interpret the chart because it does not present enough information, other than the close out mortality. First, break down mortality by week to see if trends can be identified. If trends are identified, try to correlate mortality with clinical signs observed in the barns. Record analysis, trends, clinical signs, and diagnostics are important for identifying the behavior of disease processes and are critical for appropriate timing of treatment interventions.
Figure 1 shows that there were increases in mortality in the finisher phase in the 8- to 11-week period and in the 17- to 19-week period. The death rate also remained elevated in the period between the two peaks.
An observed level of coughing was recorded weekly as a cough index in the finishing phase, and the index was correlated with the weekly mortality values generated from the weekly grow-finish health monitor. Coughing was indexed as follows:
A rise in the average cough index preceded the increase in mortality early in the finisher phase, and rose with weekly mortality later in the finishing period. Coughing and mortality continued through the end of the finishing phase (Figure 2). Stool quality index scores were normal through the finishing phase, with only isolated stool quality problems.
The number of pigs treated per day per week was also recorded in the weekly health monitor, allowing for comparison with the weekly mortality numbers.
Although mortality continued to be a problem even with the spot treating, it might have been significantly worse if no treatments had been administered. The number of treatments diminished in the last 3 weeks because of concerns about withdrawal time (Figure 3).
After identifying the correlation between the pattern of mortality and clinical signs of coughing observed in the finishers, a treatment intervention plan was implemented. The treatment consisted of two pulse doses of feed grade medication for 1 week each of feed delivery, at 6 and 14 weeks in the finisher, with the intention of intervening before the peak of mortality and coughing. The options for treatment included chlortetracycline, lincomycin, and tilmicosin. Chlortetracycline was selected on the basis of farm sensitivities and price. The chlortetracycline was dosed at 22 mg per kg (10 mg per pound).
This example shows how clinical signs may be observed in a systematic manner and recorded on a weekly observation spreadsheet, which is a useful tool for identifying trends that otherwise might not be noticed. Using the spreadsheet information on mortality, clinical signs (respiratory and enteric), and response to treatments allows development of a more predicable intervention plan than can be formulated by relying on observation of clinical signs alone.
Additional diagnostic tests will be performed in the future at 8 to 11 weeks and 17 to 19 weeks in the finisher to diagnose the respiratory problem more specifically. Monitoring of the system with the weekly health recording spreadsheet will continue to measure the success of the treatment intervention in returning mortality to the target level of < 2%.
--Paul Yeske, DVM, MS
Swine Vet Center, St Peter, Minnesota
The AASV website and The Journal of Swine Health and Production are made possible by the generous support of the AASV Industry Support Council, including: Novartis Animal Health US, Inc..
Copyright (C) 1996-2002 American Association of Swine Veterinarians. Please send your suggestions about this site to Dave Brown, firstname.lastname@example.org.
This page last updated April 19, 2012.